Male fertility: Review of the publications of April - June 2020.

The article provides an overview of the most significant publications on the topic of male infertility. The main selection criteria are the practical relevance of the article, as well as the impact factor of the journal in which it was published, according to the ScImago Journal Rank (SJR). as a result, a list of 10 works published in the II quarter (april - June) of 2020 was formed. The review includes articles on the following topics: the effect of asymptomatic genital tract infection on male fertility, methods of spermatogonia transplantation, the effect of alcohol on fertility, the role of folate status in male fertility, lumicrine regulation of spermatogenesis, oxidative-reductive balance in the male reproductive system, comparison of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and micro-TESE results, natural conception and intrauterine insemination (IUI) at high MaR test values, and the first data on the effect of cOVID-19 on male fertility.Copyright © 2020 Rostovskii Gosudarstvennyi Meditsinskii Universitet. All rights reserved.

Utility of multidisciplinary meetings in paediatric and adolescent oncofertility

Study objective: Multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) are increasingly implemented in complex care based on the principle that they lead to evidence-based treatment recommendations, foster adherence to clinical guidelines, induce better team performance and improve medical care. In oncofertility, the uncertain outcomes of fertility preservation procedures in children contribute to the complexity of decision-making. There is limited published information on the influence of MDMs on paediatric and adolescent oncofertility care. Aim(s): To describe the implementation, characteristics & outcomes of multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) in a paediatric oncofertility setting. Method(s): A retrospective medical records review of oncofertility MDMs held between April 2020 and March 2021 at the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne. Inductive content analysis of the reasons for MDM was undertaken. MDM documentation was scored out of 24, according to a Victorian Paediatric Integrated Cancer Service quality assurance checklist for MDMs, (1)) which included consent for MDM, nature of attendees, quality of discussion and documentation. Result(s): Of the 169 oncology patients treated at the Royal Children's Hospital between 1st April 2020 and 31st March 2021, MDMs were required for 40 patients (23.7%). The median number of clinical attendees was 10, and included craft groups from both paediatric and adult centres (oncology, oncofertility, gynaecology, clinical ethics, endocrinology, paediatric surgery, anaesthetics, haematology, fertility specialists and reproductive scientists). Fifty-four percent (n=22) of MDMs were for male patients (median age 8.4 [0.1-16.5] years) and 46% for females (n=18, median age 8.1[0.4-16.3] years). The commonest diagnoses presented at MDM were brain tumours (27.5%), leukemia (25%), and non malignant conditions (19.5%). Approximately 77% of all MDM patients were going to receive treatment that put them at high infertility risk and 62.5% had co-morbidities. MDMs included the following themes (i) likelihood of successful parenthood: disease progression, prognosis, neurocognitive decline;(ii) certainty or otherwise of planned treatment and infertility risks;(iii) mitigation of anaesthetic and surgical risks;(iv) ethical concerns;(v) organizational capacity and logistics in the face of covid restrictions or high dependent care between centres (vi) child and family of risks, expectations and their values regarding fertility preservation. In 87.5% of cases, it was deemed permissible to offer fertility preservation. The median score for the MDMs derived from the quality assurance checklist was 16. Conclussion: MDMs acted as a valuable educational and communication tool improving situational awareness, building shared mental models, assisting with risk mitigation and oncofertility planning.Copyright © 2023

Cryopreservation of Human Spermatozoa: Functional, Molecular and Clinical Aspects.

Cryopreservation is an expanding strategy to allow not only fertility preservation for individuals who need such procedures because of gonadotoxic treatments, active duty in dangerous occupations or social reasons and gamete donation for couples where conception is denied, but also for animal breeding and preservation of endangered animal species. Despite the improvement in semen cryopreservation techniques and the worldwide expansion of semen banks, damage to spermatozoa and the consequent impairment of its functions still remain unsolved problems, conditioning the choice of the technique in assisted reproduction procedures. Although many studies have attempted to find solutions to limit sperm damage following cryopreservation and identify possible markers of damage susceptibility, active research in this field is still required in order to optimize the process. Here, we review the available evidence regarding structural, molecular and functional damage occurring in cryopreserved human spermatozoa and the possible strategies to prevent it and optimize the procedures. Finally, we review the results on assisted reproduction technique (ARTs) outcomes following the use of cryopreserved spermatozoa.

Oocyte Quality Assessment in Breast Cancer: Implications for Fertility Preservation.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of breast cancer on the ovarian response and on oocyte quality following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). METHODS: This retrospective case-control study evaluated the effects of breast cancer on the ovarian response and on the oocyte quality. Oncological patients with breast cancer undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation cycles for fertility preservation, and age- and date-matched controls undergoing COH for in vitro fertilization (IVF) for male or tubal factor infertility were included in the study. Two hundred and ninety-four women were enrolled: 105 affected by breast cancer and 189 healthy women in the control group. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, BMI, and AMH value. Maximal estradiol levels on the triggering day, duration of stimulation, total amount of gonadotropins administered, number of oocytes retrieved, rate of metaphase 2 oocyte production, and numbers of immature and dysmorphic oocytes were analyzed. RESULTS: Considering factors influencing the oocyte quality, such as age, BMI, AMH, duration of stimulation, E2 level on the triggering day, total FSH cumulative dose, stage, histotype, BRCA status, and hormone receptors, the univariate and multivariate analyses identified breast cancer as a risk factor for the presence of dysmorphic oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of breast cancer does not seem to be associated with the impairment of the ovarian reserve, but is linked to a worsening oocyte quality.

Building an expert and patient peer based internet system to support young patients with cancer

Introduction: Approximately 16,500 patients develop cancer in Germany in the ages between 18 und 39 years. Many of them experience fnancial and social problems as a consequence of the disease and its treatment. Young patients represent a small proportion of all cancer patients (3%) and their social situation is very heterogenous. Tey face difculties to get helpful counseling and support. Method(s): Young Cancer Portal (www.junges-krebsportal.de) is an internet-based support system for young cancer patients. It has fve sections:.,First Aid" provides hints and experiences how to cope and how to organize oneself in the first time after diagnosis.,Knowledge Base" provides medical, organizational and legal informations on fertility preservation, on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemia, information for students with cancer, young families, how to deal with insurance companies, problems of severely disabled etc. It is built in intensive interaction with young cancer patients from the.,meeting points" of the foundation. The sections.,Online Consultation Hour" and.,Webinars" provide further informations in an easy understandable format. In the section.,Individual Counseling" expert counseling on social and medical topics is offered as chat on a protected sever and in direct contact. As a new feature support from patient peers with special expertise will be realized. These peers are recruited from the editorial teams who were involved in the development of the information pages on the different topics. Result(s): As on march 23rd, 1,098 patients have been registered for.,individual counseling" and 677 consultations have been performed plus by now 100 consultations on reimbursement for fertility preservation. There have been more than 30,000 visits on the Corona pages. Seven patients' editorial teams have been formed. The pages on fnancial and social problems of students and young families are in final editing. Conclusion(s): We present a new way to provide information on medical, fnancial and social problems to support young cancer patients. By involving active patients from the meeting points of the foundation and organizing them in editorial teams the focus of the information pages is sharpened. Based on their work in the editorial teams these patients are enabled and mobilized to support other patients as peers.

Successful Pregnancies, Births, and Children Development Following Oocyte Cryostorage in Female Cancer Patients During 25 Years of Fertility Preservation.

The preservation of fertility in cancer patients is a crucial aspect of modern reproductive medicine. Amenorrhea and infertility often occur after cancer therapy, worsening the quality of life. Cryopreservation of oocytes in young cancer patients is a therapeutic option for preserving fertility. A prospective study was conducted on 508 cancer patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation to preserve fertility between 1996 and 2021 including the COVID-19 pandemic period. Patients underwent ovarian stimulation, followed by egg retrieval, and oocytes were cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification. Sixty-four thawing/warming cycles were performed. Survival, fertilization, pregnancy, and birth rate over the thawing/warming cycles were obtained. The data were compared with those from a group of 1042 nononcological patients who cryopreserved supernumerary oocytes. An average of 8.8 ± 6.9 oocytes were retrieved per cycle, and 6.1 ± 4.2 oocytes were cryopreserved. With their own stored oocytes, 44 patients returned to attempt pregnancy. From a total of 194 thawed/warmed oocytes, 157 survived (80%). In total, 100 embryos were transferred in 57 transfer/cycles, and 18 pregnancies were achieved. The pregnancy rate per transfer and pregnancy rate per patient were 31% and 41%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between oncological patients and nononcological patients. A total of 15 babies were born from oncological patients. Children born showed normal growth and development. One minor malformation was detected.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ovarian tissue cryopreservation planning in the Bologna clinical center.

Introduction: Treatment of patients with COVID-19 has been a priority by competing with the treatment of any other disease due to limited hospital resources. The current pandemic situation has focused the attention of healthcare providers around the world away from all other non-emergency health problems, including oncofertility. The aim of the study was to evaluate the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on the activity levels of ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in the our center. Methods: The study analyzed the number of patients treated for OTC in our center during three periods: pre-pandemic period: March 2019-February 2020, pandemic period: March 2020-February 2021 and post-pandemic period: March 2021-February 2022. Results: In our center routine hospital operation was completely reorganized, allowing only urgent interventions. Continuing to urgently preserve fertility during the pandemic required rapid changes to our standard practices for the care of these vulnerable patients. Despite the modifications, there was no difference in the number of OTC performed among the periods analyzed. Similarly, the number of patients who did not perform OTC was the same over the three years analyzed. Discussion: Despite the local and national restructuring of care to conserve resources and protect the community, it is significant to continue offering fertility-sparing treatment to cancer patients. This emphasis on the importance of preserving fertility despite the pandemic further highlights the essential and urgent nature of this procedure.

Validation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay: a requirement to evaluate viral contamination in human semen.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it possible to validate an accurate and reliable method for direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in human semen fractions? DESIGN: This qualitative improvement study aimed to provide a prospective validation of SARS-CoV-2 detection in male semen. The SARS-CoV-2 genome was detected by multiplex real-time RT-PCR on patient samples that underwent routine semen analyses for infertility at the Center for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand. Samples comprised surplus semen collected for treatment with assisted reproductive technology. Seminal fluid and spermatozoa fractions were isolated with density gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved. Positive samples were prepared with a standard of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 particles. RESULTS: The analytical method was validated in both seminal fluid and spermatozoa fractions. In both semen fractions, the assay was repeatable, reproducible and showed high sensitivity with a limit of detection of 0.33 SARS-CoV-2 genome copies/µl. The limit of quantification was 1 copy of the SARS-CoV-2 genome/µl. The method was effective regardless of semen quality (normal and altered sperm parameters), number of spermatozoa or the cryoprotectant media used to freeze spermatozoa. CONCLUSION: This validated RT-PCR assay provided accurate and reliable screening of SARS-CoV-2 in seminal fluid and spermatozoa fractions. This method is essential to ensure protection against viral contamination in the cryobanking process.

Review of the impact of COVID-19 on male reproduction, and its implications on assisted reproductive technology services.

The announcement in 2019 of a new coronavirus disease that quickly became a major pandemic, is an exceptional challenge to healthcare systems never seen before. Such a public health emergency can largely influence various aspects of people's health as well as reproductive outcome. IVF specialists should be vigilant, monitoring the situation whilst contributing by sharing novel evidence to counsel patients, both pregnant women and would-be mothers. Coronavirus infection might adversely affect pregnant women and their offspring. Consequently, this review paper aims to analyse its potential risks for reproductive health, as well as potential effects of the virus on gamete function and embryo development. In addition, reopening fertility clinics poses several concerns that need immediate addressing, such as the effect of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on reproductive cells and also the potential risk of cross-contamination and viral transmission. Therefore, this manuscript summarizes what is currently known about the effect of the SARS-CoV-2 infection on medically assisted reproductive treatments and its effect on reproductive health and pregnancy.

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting I

The proceedings contain 5148 papers. The topics discussed include: baseline GP2 immune response as an independent prognostic factor in a phase IIb study evaluating HER2/neu peptide GP2 (GLSI-100) versus. GM-CSF alone after adjuvant trastuzumab in HER2-positive women with breast cancer;fertility preservation decisions and outcomes of young women with breast cancer;adjuvant trastuzumab and vinorelbine (TV) for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer;Outcomes of neoadjuvant (NA) and adjuvant (A) chemotherapy in geriatric patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): a single institution experience;Telehealth delivered Tai Chi intervention for managing aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer patients: TaiChi4Joint during the COVID-19 pandemic a pilot study;a prospective real-world study to assess the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab biosimilar in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: preliminary safety results;effectiveness of chemotherapy on prognosis of elderly breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study based on SEER database;and prognostic role of the stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in women with early ER+/HER2+ breast cancer (BC) in whom adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) was omitted.

Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination (BNT162b2) has no adverse effect on elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do elective oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in women 1-13 months after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination alter compared with unvaccinated women and do different time intervals between vaccination and ovarian stimulation impact these outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a university-affiliated IVF centre, included 232 elective oocyte cryopreservation cycles of vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, without previous infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, between December 2020 and January 2022. Two control groups - pre-pandemic (January 2019 to February 2020) and intra-pandemic (December 2020 to January 2022) unvaccinated groups - were compared with the vaccinated group, further divided into four subgroups (under 3, 3-6, 6-9 and 9-13 months). The primary outcome was the elective oocyte cryopreservation cycle outcomes - number of retrieved and number of mature oocytes. RESULTS: The vaccinated group demonstrated comparable outcomes with regards to number of retrieved and mature oocytes compared with the pre-pandemic and intra-pandemic unvaccinated groups (12.6 ± 8.0 versus 13.0 ± 8.2 and 12.5 ± 7.4 retrieved and 10.1 ± 6.9 versus 9.5 ± 6.4 and 10.1 ± 6.3 mature oocytes, respectively; not significant for both). Similar results were noted in a comparison between the intra-pandemic unvaccinated group and the four vaccinated subgroups. No correlation was found between the parameter of days from vaccination and cycle outcomes. Similarly, analysis of covariance showed no association between vaccination status and timing and number of mature oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 vaccination does not alter the outcomes of elective oocyte cryopreservation procedures. This is true even in a relatively long time interval of 9 to 13 months from vaccination.

prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer

Purpose or Objective The high burden of COVID-19 in hospitals puts increased pressure on oncological care worldwide, forces prioritization of healthcare resources and causes delays in cancer treatment pathways. Prior research underlined the importance of timely oncological care, as longer waiting times from diagnosis to treatment could result in poorer outcomes for some common malignancies. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of waiting time from diagnosis to treatment on overall survival in patients with cervical cancer treated with surgery or radiotherapy with curative intent. Materials and Methods Patients from a nationwide population-based cohort with newly diagnosed cervical cancer between 2010 and 2019 were studied. Patients who underwent surgery or radiotherapy with curative intent were selected. Waiting time was defined as the time interval between first pathologic confirmation of carcinoma and the day of first treatment. Waiting time was modeled as continuous (i.e. linear per week), dichotomized (i.e. ≤8 versus >8 weeks), and polynomial (i.e. restricted cubic splines). The association between waiting time and overall survival was examined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Results Among 6,895 patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer, 2,831 patients treated with primary surgery and 1,898 patients who received primary radiotherapy were included. Waiting time to surgery was 8.5 (±4.2) weeks on average and >8 weeks in 1,287 patients (45%). Waiting to radiotherapy was 7.7 (±2.9) weeks on average and >8 weeks in 681 patients (36%). In the surgery group, a longer waiting time was associated with younger age, fertility treatment, adenocarcinoma histology, poor differentiation grade, LVSI, higher T- and N-stage, and previous conization or portio amputation. Adjusted for confounders, waiting time to surgery was not significantly associated with overall survival (continuous HR 0.99 [95%CI: 0.95- 1.02], dichotomized HR 0.93 [0.69-1.26], polynomial HR in Figure 1). In the radiotherapy group, a longer waiting time was associated with higher BMI, higher number of co-morbidities, and lower T-stage. Chemotherapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy in 1,276 patients (67.2%) and was not associated with a longer waiting time. Adjusted for confounders, a longer waiting time to radiotherapy was not significantly associated with poorer overall survival (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.00], dichotomized HR 0.91 [0.76-1.09], polynomial HR in Figure 2). Conclusion This large population-based cohort study demonstrates that a longer waiting time from diagnosis to treatment (of up to 12 weeks) in patients with cervical cancer treated with curatively intended surgery or radiotherapy does not negatively impact overall survival. These results could help inform and reassure patients regarding their waiting time, for example when time is needed for fertility preservation.

FERTILITY PRESERVATION COUNSELING AND FAMILY PLANNING PRIOR TO AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

OBJECTIVE: The delivery of women's healthcare has changed drastically with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. This has undoubtedly created significant uncertainties for those interested in conception counseling. In particular, fertility preservation (FP) is time-sensitive and often emergent or urgent for patients undergoing gonadotoxic therapy. ASRM provided close monitoring and guidelines during this time of crisis. Our objective was to examine the effect of the pandemic on fertility preservation counseling and family planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Claims data from Symphony Health, one of the largest databases of patient-level data on more than 280 million patients in the US, was examined from May 1, 2019 to February 28, 2021. Reproductive-aged women were included in the analysis. March - April 2020 was used as a threshold for when healthcare restrictions became widespread. We compared 10 months prior to the pandemic (May 2019 - Feb 2020) and the same time period after the start of the pandemic (May 2020 - Feb 2021). Fertility preservation counseling (Z31.62), FP procedures (Z31.84), and general family planning counseling (Z31.61 and Z31.69) were identified using ICD-10 codes. Data analysis was conducted in Stata, version 16.1, using 2-sided t-tests with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: In our search, 14,491 FP consultations, 15,049 FP procedures, and 359,218 family planning encounters were identified. The mean age of women undergoing FP and family planning counseling decreased significantly when comparing prior to and during the pandemic (31.9±7.6 vs 31.4±7.1 years, and 32.2±6.1 vs 31.6±6 years, respectively). The average age for patients who underwent a FP procedure (33.5±6.5 vs 33±6.4 years) was also statistically different. Time series plot shows a substantial dropin focal variables in March - April 2020. Interestingly, all three variables quickly recovered to prepandemic baseline by June 2020. FP consultations increased from 542 encounters per month pre-pandemic vs 737 per month during the pandemic, P < 0.001. Similarly, FP proceduresincreased from 640 to 781, P=0.02. In contrast, family planning did not change significantly (16,376 vs 17,552, P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: FP counseling and procedures increased during the pandemic, despite healthcare restrictions and lockdown measures. On the other hand, family planning encounters did not change. Despite barriers to care related to the pandemic, time-sensitive fertility preservation counseling and procedures continued to be utilized. Our findings also reflect ASRM recommendations regarding suspension of non-emergent fertility management at the onset of the pandemic, and continuity of urgent services afterwards. IMPACT STATEMENT: FP counseling and treatment are emergent services that were not negatively impacted by pandemic-related healthcare restrictions. Under ASRM guidelines, FP continued at an increased pace. This experience shows that, under close guidance, emergent or urgent services may be continued during a public health crisis.

The use of oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in patients with sex chromosome disorders: a case series describing outcomes.

PURPOSE: Characterize outcomes among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sex chromosome disorders (SCDs) after oocyte cryopreservation (OC) consultation. METHODS: Retrospective case series of all AYA (< 25 years) patients with SCDs seen for OC consultation from 2011 to 2019 at a large, urban, academic fertility center. All AYA patients with an SCD seen for OC consult in the study time period were reviewed and included. Data collected included patient age, SCD type, number of patients who attempted OC, number of cycles attempted, and cycle outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included: 9 with Turner syndrome, 12 with mosaic Turner syndrome, and 1 with 47,XXX. Mean age at consult was 14.7 ± 3.5 years. Fourteen patients elected for OC: 5 with Turner syndrome, 8 with mosaic Turner syndrome, and 1 47,XXX who pursued 31 OC cycles total. Of those 14 patients, 10 underwent retrieval, 9 froze oocytes, and 8 froze mature (MII) oocytes. Seven patients underwent > 1 cycle and 7 had ≥ 1 cancelation. 3/3 patients who pursued cycles after 1st cancelation never got to retrieval. Age, SCD type, and baseline FSH did not predict ability to freeze MIIs. One patient returned after OC and attempted 4 ovulation induction cycles and 2 IVF cycles; all were canceled for low response. CONCLUSIONS: AYA patients with SCDs have a high risk of poor response and cycle cancelation but the majority froze MIIs. Thus, setting expectations is important. A larger sample size is needed to evaluate possible clinical predictors of success.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perception of planned oocyte cryopreservation in the United States.

Objective: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on attitudes toward planned oocyte cryopreservation (OC). Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Internet-based survey questionnaire distributed nationally. Patients: One thousand women aged 21-45 years, stratified by age ≤35 or >35 years. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Change in the likelihood of considering OC because of the pandemic. Results: Of the participants who reported that the pandemic altered their likelihood of considering OC (15.2%, n = 152), 52.6% (n = 80) reported an increased and 47.3% (n = 72) reported a decreased likelihood of considering OC. Vaccination status did not affect the likelihood of considering OC. In multivariable analysis, history of COVID-19 infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-2.45), government-subsidized insurance (OR 1.47; 95% CI 0.97-2.21), loss of health insurance because of the pandemic (OR 2.32; 95% CI 1.15-4.66), working more (OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.62-5.51) or less (OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.65-3.90) because of the pandemic, and relationship status (divorced, separated, or widowed [OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.99]) were significantly associated with a change in the likelihood of considering OC because of the pandemic. Of those who believed that the COVID-19 pandemic influenced their childbearing plans (28.3%, n = 283), 64.0% (n = 181) deferred childbearing and 29.7% (n = 84) expedited childbearing. The pandemic's economic impact, concerns regarding safety of pregnancy/childbirth, and safety of childrearing were cited as most influential on childbearing (67%, 70%, 58%, respectively) and on the likelihood of considering OC (47%, 45%, and 34%, respectively). Conclusions: Through its negative impact on financial security and perceived safety, the COVID-19 pandemic has altered the likelihood of considering OC in >15% of reproductive-aged women and reproductive timelines in 30%. Vaccination has not significantly modified these changes.

Fertility Preservation in Female Patients with Cancer.

Advances in cancer treatment with resultant dramatic improvements in long-term survival have led to increasing awareness of the wide range of medical and social issues faced by survivors of malignancy. The potential deleterious effects on fertility are a significant worry of women and trans gender men, and the rising trend in delaying childbearing and the higher proportion of patients who have not completed their family at the time of diagnosis increases the demand for an optimised fertility-preservation service. Fertility preservation for this group following a diagnosis of cancer is a rapidly expanding area of reproductive medicine, although provision for such treatment often varies by region. In the past, there were few treatment options, but with dramatic improvements in oocyte cryopreservation and, more recently, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, this area of fertility care has broadened substantially. This review will be exploring areas that apply to all cisgender women, but not necessarily all trans men and non-binary individuals. There are specific considerations in fertility preservation for trans people, which are beyond the scope of this paper. All individuals with female reproductive organs should be offered the opportunity to discuss fertility preservation prior to starting potential gonadotoxic treatment. Failure to do this may negatively influence their anticancer treatment choices and adherence to treatment regimens. There are currently few networks streamlined around offering this service and as demand for these treatment options increases, it is recognised that these complex patients require specialist management within recognised care pathways. Here we are looking to describe some of the unique challenges associated with providing a state-of-the-art service, particularly in a financially unpredictable climate in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility preservation activities in France: A survey by the Groupe de Recherche et d'Etude sur la Conservation Ovarienne et Testiculaire (GRECOT; group for research and studies on ovarian and testicular preservation).

BACKGROUND: To study the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic for fertility preservation activities in France. BASIC PROCEDURES: A questionnaire was sent to all the fertility preservation centres, requesting, for fertility preservation techniques (gamete and gonadal tissue preservation), the number of patients managed before, during and after the lockdown, and the number of patients who were not able to have access to these techniques and thus suffered definitive losses of fertility, during the lockdown period in spring 2020. MAIN FINDINGS: Fertility preservation activities in France did not cease entirely during the lockdown, but a 42.6% decrease in activity was observed. After lockdown, the levels of sperm, testicular and ovarian tissue cryopreservation returned to pre-lockdown levels (95.2%). The restoration of activity was partial only for oocyte freezing, which reached a level 56.8% that before lockdown. In total, 45 patients (8.35%) lost all chance of fertility preservation during the lockdown period. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: In France, fertility preservation activities were significantly affected by the lockdown in spring 2020 linked to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fertility Preservation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Modified But Uncompromised.

Purpose: Throughout COVID-19, our clinic remained operational for patients requiring urgent fertility preservation (FP). This study aimed to characterize changes to clinical protocols during the first wave of COVID-19 and compare outcomes to historical controls. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study at a university fertility center examining all patients who underwent medically indicated FP cycles during the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) COVID-19 Task Force-recommended suspension of fertility treatment (March 17-May 11, 2020) and patients from the same time period in 2019. FP care was modified for safety during the first wave of COVID-19 with fewer monitoring visits and infection control measures. FP cycle characteristics and outcomes were compared across years. Results: The volume of cycles was nearly 30% higher in 2020 versus 2019 (27 vs. 19). Diagnoses, age, and anti-Mullerian hormone were similar between cohorts. More patients elected to pursue embryo cryopreservation over oocyte cryopreservation in 2020 versus 2019 (45.8% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.005). Patients managed during COVID-19 had fewer monitoring visits (5 ± 1 vs. 6 ± 1, p = 0.02), and 37.5% of cycles utilized a blind trigger injection. There was no difference in total days of ovarian stimulation (11 ± 1 vs. 11 ± 2, p > 0.05), but 2020 cycles utilized more gonadotropin (4770 ± 1480 vs. 3846 ± 1438, p = 0.04). There was no difference in total oocytes retrieved (19 ± 14 vs. 22 ± 12, p > 0.05) or mature oocytes vitrified (15 ± 12 vs. 17 ± 9, p > 0.05) per cycle. Conclusions: FP continued during COVID-19, and more cycles were completed in 2020 versus 2019. Despite minimized monitoring, outcomes were optimal and equivalent to historical controls, suggesting FP care can be adapted without compromising outcomes.

[French clinical practice guidelines developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease]. / Indications de vitrification ovocytaire dans les pathologies gynécologiques bénignes : conseils de bonne pratique du CNGOF après étude de consensus par méthode Delphi.

OBJECTIVES: To provide clinical practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) for women with benign gynecologic disease (BGD) developed by a modified Delphi consensus process for oocyte vitrification in women with benign gynecologic disease. METHODS: A steering committee composed of 14 healthcare professionals and a patient representative with lived experience of endometriosis identified 42 potential practices related to FP for BGD. Then 114 key stakeholders including various healthcare professionals (n=108) and patient representatives (n=6) were asked to participate in a modified Delphi process via two online survey rounds from February to September 2020 and a final meeting. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this final meeting to reach consensus was held as a videoconference in November 2020. RESULTS: Survey response of stakeholders was 75 % (86/114) for round 1 and 87 % (75/86) for round 2. Consensus was reached for the recommendations for 28 items, that have been distributed into five general categories: (i) Information to provide to women of reproductive age with a BGD, (ii) Technical aspects of FP for BGD, (iii) Indications for FP in endometriosis, (iv) Indications for FP for non-endometriosis BGD, (v) Indications for FP after a fortuitous diagnosis of an idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve. CONCLUSION: These guidelines provide some practice advice to help health professionals better inform women about the possibilities of cryopreserving their oocytes prior to the management of a BGD that may affect their ovarian reserve and fertility. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The CNGOF (Collège National des Gynécologues Obstétriciens Français) funded the implementation of the Delphi process.

WOMEN AND MEN WITH CANCER AND A FUTURE DESIRE FOR CHILDREN - WHAT SHOULD CLINICIANS CONSIDER IN COVID-19 PANDEMIC TIMES?

The topic of fertility preservation has been gaining increasing importance since the beginning of this century. The reasons for this development are the advances in oncological therapy over the past few decades, with cure rates of approximately over 90%, and the fact that starting families is increasingly postponed in later periods of life in industrialized countries. Since March 2020 the whole medical and non-medical world experiences a pandemic due to Covid-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) which has never been seen before. This created a plenty of challenges for both, the patients and healthcare providers. This review article presents the fertility-protective methods currently available for women and men suffering from cancer with their clinical approach, value, advantages and disadvantages. Besides, it focuses on the changes and special considerations which have to be taken into account during pandemic times including preventive measures as well as the patient's access to the fertility preserving options. In conclusion every premenopausal woman and every man with incomplete family planning suffering from cancer should be counselled about the existing fertility preserving techniques before commencing cancer therapy.